Dukes v. State of NY
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Walter Dukes (“Dukes”), an attorney appearing pro se, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 seeking redress for alleged violations of his constitutional rights. Dukes contends, inter alia, that defendant police officers Thomas Dowd (“Dowd”) and Carlos Gomez (“Gomez”) arrested and imprisoned him without probable cause, that Dowd and Gomez utilized excessive force in effecting his arrest, that his arrest, prosecution and conviction were the product of a conspiracy among Dowd, Gomez and others to deprive him of his rights, and that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kenneth S. Cameron v. Matthew Fogarty and John HalbigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Willie D. White v. Richard Frank, Freeman Marshall, City of PoughkeepsieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mason v. StockDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Bowles v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Yevstifeev v. SteveDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Haddock v. ChristosDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- McGregor v. City of Olathe, KSDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.