Christie Transfer & Storage Co. v. Hatch
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This action is to enjoin defendant Hatch from using the highways of the state as a motor carrier.
The complaint shows that plaintiff is a carrier of property by motor vehicle and the holder of a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the board of railroad commissioners; that defendant Hatch is operating as a motor carrier for hire in the same locality, without a permit or certificate from the board of railroad commissioners, and hence is competing with plaintiff and interfering with and injuring plaintiff’s business.
After the filing of the complaint, upon leave of court the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Collins-Dietz-Morris Co. v. State Corporation Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Holmes v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Barney v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Murphy v. Standard Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rountree v. State Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Board of Railroad Commissioners v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Gamble-Robinson Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1941
- Lowe v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Lowe v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949