In re Murray
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Torrance County. Edward L. Medler, Presiding Judge. Taxes. Cooley on Taxation, p. 527; Yol. 37 Cyc. pp. 1170-1; Yol. 23 Cyc., Sec. D, p. 681; Yol. 12 Ene. Pie. and Pc. p. 179; Abbott’s Trial Brief, Yol. 11, p. 976. Construction of Statute. Lewis’ Sutherland Stat. Construction, Yol. 2, p. 852; 13 Ohio St. Rep. 458, 465; 2 Mass. 136; Lewis’ Sutherland Stat. Con. pp. 910, 915.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT.
ROBERTS, C. J.
Upon petition of Charles C. Murray, Receiver of the New Mexico Central Railroad Company, the district court of Torrance County entered an ■order approving a resolution passed by the Board of County Commissioners óf said county, recommending an adjustment and compromise of the taxes assessed against said railroad company for the years 1910, 1911 and 1912, respectively, and the county treasurer was ordered and directed to accept the amount so found to be due by the decree in full settlement of the said taxes. From this order the county treasurer appealed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ditch v. SennottIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Davis v. LangIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Williston v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
- Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. MeehanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
- Benneson v. SavageIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Birchfield v. BirchfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Kershner v. Trinidad Mill. & Min. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- State Tax Commission v. Santa Teresa Land Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925