Legal Opinion

Davis v. Lang

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1894PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Morgan county; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

In the year 1873 Daniel B. Davis died intestate, and seized in fee of one hundred and sixty acres of land in Morgan county. He left him surviving his widow and four children,—John Kenney Davis, the plaintiff in error, William R. Davis, Harriet A. Lang and Sarah J. Ransdell. Said William R. Davis conveyed, by quit-claim deed, his undivided one-quarter interest in the land to plaintiff in error. In 1885 the widow died. In 1889 Harriet A. Lang and Sarah J. Ransdell exhibited this their bill for partition, alleging the above facts ; that they were each the owner of an undivided one-fourth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williston v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Benneson v. SavageIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Lincoln v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Thompson v. FrewIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cole v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Haggerty v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Brady v. PaineIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Boone v. BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Farmer v. FowlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API