Legal Opinion

United States v. Durham

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 22, 1990No. Cr. A. 90-36-JLLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

This motion to suppress presents yet another version of the classic regret, “If I’d only known....” 1 In this case, if he had only known the charges were serious, the defendant would not have surrendered and confessed and would have instead eluded U.S. authorities by fleeing to Peru. Need less to say, there is no law that requires this Court to give constitutional protection to the defendant’s contingency plans for an escape to South America. Therefore, for the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the defendant’s motion to suppress.

FACTU…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. UngaWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. UngaWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. United States v. ChambersDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API