Legal Opinion
Schum v. Bailey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 26, 1978No. 77-1380PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a diversity action brought in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The district court concluded that plaintiff’s claim was time-barred under the New York statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims. The plaintiff, Diana M. Schum, is a New Jersey resident. In her complaint she alleges that the defendant, Charles P Bailey, M. D., a resident of New York, subjected her to unnecessary surgery in St. Barnabas Hospital in the *494Bronx, New…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Draper v. Airco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- John J. Demarines and Doris A. Demarines, Husband and Wife v. Klm Royal Dutch AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.