Legal Opinion

Lineiro v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 18, 1948No. C. D. 1126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

These are protests arising at the port of Nogales against the collector's assessment of duty on merchandise invoiced as milo maize at the rate of 2 cents per pound under paragraph 763 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as “grass and forage crop seeds not specially provided for.” It is claimed that the merchandise is entitled to free entry under paragraph 1722 as a crude vegetable substance, or is dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 as a nonenumerated unmanufactured article.

The pertinent provisions of the tariff act are as follows:

Pae. 763. Grass seeds and other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bache & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. Reed v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Song Kee v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API