Tynan v. Kerns
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. J. H. Logan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion-
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
A demurrer to the complaint was sustained on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and, plaintiff declining to amend, judgment passed for defendants, from which plaintiff appeals. It appears from the complaint that the defendants’ intestate died in October, 1892, and on November 28th his surviving widow, one of defendants, was appointed administratrix of his estate, and on December 13th she returned her inventory and appraisement. The court made an order directing that publication of notice to creditors be made in the Santa Cruz Daily…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Shain v. SresovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Paterson v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tracy v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Henrici v. South Feather Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Hagey v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Warfield v. Anglo & London Paris National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.