Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Bowman
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 1932No. Docket No. 1009PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, J., pro tem.
This is the second appeal in this action of Frances C. Bowman to annul the marriage of Horace D. Bowman and Bryan Houston Bowman. In the first trial judgment was entered for Frances C. Bowman, Bryan Houston Bowman appealed and the judgment was reversed. (Bowman v. Bowman, 97 Cal. App. 613 [275 Pac. 1023; 1024].) Frances C. Bowman asked for a rehearing, which was denied and hearing in the Supreme Court was also denied. Then Frances C. Bowman moved for a new trial in the court below on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to -sustain the findings. This motion was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Klauber v. San Diego Street Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wise v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Leathers v. LeathersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Lynn v. DuckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Gregory v. HancockIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- French v. Construction Laborers Pension TrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.