Legal Opinion

Scherr v. Drobac

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1972No. 232PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

On November 5, 1971, this court affirmed the judgment in Leatherman v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. The only difference between Leatherman and this case is that the provisions of sec. 204.80 (5) (a), Stats. 1967, apply to this action but were not enacted at the time the Leatherman accident occurred. Sec. 204.30 (5) (a) requires automobile liability insurance policies to include uninsured motorist coverage unless rejected by the insured. The new statute provides:

“(5) Uninsured Motorist Coverage, (a) No automobile liability or motor vehicle liability policy of insurance insuring against loss…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leatherman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Radlein v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Landvatter v. Globe Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API