United States v. Peterson
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1ConcurrenceKennett, Judge
I concur in the result reached by the Senior Judge and agree that United States v. Bradley, 7 M.J. 332 (C.M.A.1979), is the controlling precedent. Bradley sets forth a very simple procedure for military judges, to wit: if the accused’s pleas are changed from guilty to not guilty after the judge enters findings of guilty, the judge must either recuse himself or direct a trial with members. Bradley, 7 M.J. at 334. See United States v. Cooper, 8 M.J. 5, 7 (C.M.A.1979). This procedure needs neither objective nor subjective analysis: it is a mandatory decision dictated by the timing of the change…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. BradleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. CooperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. FlynnU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981