Westfield Insurance Company v. Robinson Outdoors, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
Robinson Outdoors, Inc. (“Robinson”) marketed and sold camouflage products that, according to Robinson, would eliminate human scent so that wild game, with their acute sense of smell, would not be able to detect a hunter’s presence. Consumers who had purchased these products brought class action lawsuits against Robinson, claiming that Robinson’s products did not actually eliminate human odor (collectively, “the underlying lawsuits”). Robinson sought defense and indemnification from its insurer, Westfield Insurance Company (“Westfield”), but Westfield declined…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Michael Woods v. Daimlerchrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Spirtas Company v. Nautilus Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Continental Casualty Company v. Winder Laboratories, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Olga Despotis Trust v. Cincinnati Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Indian Harbor InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. C.C.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.