Legal Opinion

State v. Schonarth

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 2, 2005No. 2003-622PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The defendant, Vincent Schonarth, appeals his convictions on seventeen counts of theft by deception. See RSA 637:4 (1996). On appeal, he contends that the Trial Court (T. Nadeau, J.) erred in: (1) consolidating the seventeen indictments for trial; (2) denying his motions to dismiss and for directed verdict; and (3) allowing a trial deposition of the victim prior to trial. We affirm.

The record supports the following facts. The defendant first met the victim, Denley Emerson, in 1996 when the defendant contacted him to inquire about renting property that Emerson owned. Emerson advised the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RamosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. McIntyreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. State v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. State v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. State v. SargentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CrieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  2. State v. GiovanniSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. State v. BreedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API