Legal Opinion

State v. McIntyre

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 18, 2004No. 2003-395PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The defendant, Jeremy McIntyre, was convicted by a jury in the Superior Court (T. Nadeau, J.) of one count of felonious sexual assault by touching the victim’s breast, see RSA 632-A:3, III (1996) (amended 2003), and three counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault by digital penetration, cunnilingus and fellatio, see RSA 632-A:2, I (l) (1996) (amended 2003). The defendant appeals, arguing that the Superior Court (Mohl, J.) erroneously denied his pretrial motion to sever the felonious sexual assault charge from the aggravated felonious sexual assault charges. We affirm.

The pertinent facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MelcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. State v. RamosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. State v. SchultzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. State v. CastineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. State v. MichaudSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. State v. AbramSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. State Farm Insurance v. BrunsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. State v. GiovanniSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. State v. SchonarthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API