Legal Opinion
United States v. Tomeny
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 24, 1998No. 97-3089, 97-3090PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Senior Circuit Judge:
Having pleaded guilty to one count each of making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, Theodore S. Tomeny (“Tomeny”)- and Steve -Tomeny, Inc. (“Tomeny, Inc.”) appeal their convictions. Their sole contention is that 16 U.S.C. § 1857(1)(I), the criminal false statement provision of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1882 (“the Magnuson Act”), preempts 18 U.S.C. § 1Ó01, the general federal criminal false statement provision. 1 We hold that appellants did not waive the right to challenge their convictions,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Michael J. PeterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Danielle Lenise BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.