Legal Opinion
Paramount Insurance v. Miccio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 22, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In (1) an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that Paramount Insurance Company is not obligated to pay no-fault insurance benefits to the respondent Allan Miccio (matter No. 1), and (2) a related proceeding by Paramount Insurance Company for a stay of arbitration (matter No. 2), Paramount Insurance Company appeals, (1) as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated June 15, 1989, as, in matter No. 1 granted the respondent Statewide Insurance Company’s motion, inter alia, to compel arbitration, and (2) a judgment of the same…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Matwijko v. LumberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Balletti v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Whitehead v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009
- M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Paramount Insurance v. MiccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992