Legal Opinion

Paramount Insurance v. Miccio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered on or about April 7, 1992, which granted motions by defendant claimant and third-party defendant insurer to reargue a prior order of the same court staying the action pending inter-company arbitration between plaintiff insurer and third-party defendant insurer, and, upon reargument, directed the parties to trial on the issue of damages only, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The issue of liability in this action de novo pursuant to Insurance Law § 5106 (c) was resolved in prior litigation *318before the Second Department…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Paramount Insurance v. MiccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API