Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2000No. Trial No. F99-2091Z, Appeal No. C-000011PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

The juvenile court found appellant Durrie Allen guilty of child endangerment under R.C. 2919.22(A) and sentenced him to ninety days in the Hamilton County Justice Center. Allen appeals, claiming in his sole assignment of error that his conviction was against the weight of the evidence, but actually arguing that it was not supported by sufficient evidence. While we recognize that sufficiency and weight are separate issues, we address the argument incorporated in Allen’s assignment and view his appeal as one challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.

For Allen to be convicted of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CatonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. HartleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. BushOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. Fretas, 07ap-1046 (9-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API