Legal Opinion

State v. Hartley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 2011No. C-100515-520PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In these consolidated appeals, defendant-appellant, Pamela Hartley, challenges her convictions on three counts of endangering children 1 and three counts of misrepresentation by a child-care provider. 2

{¶ 2} Hartley, the director of a licensed child-daycare center, repeatedly gave young children under her care pills containing a supplement of the hormone melatonin to cause them to sleep in the afternoon. Although Hartley failed to disclose to the children’s parents that she was administering the supplement, she did not affirmatively misrepresent its use.

{¶ 3} For the reasons that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. VanestOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. BushOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. CookOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. GreenleeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API