Legal Opinion

McGarrigle v. Roman Catholic Orphan Asylum

California Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1905No. S.F. No. 2889PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. D. C. Murphy, John L. Seawell, and Frank J. Sullivan, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was to quiet title to forty-two acres of land in the county of Sonoma. Cordelia Jones during her lifetime conveyed an estate in the land in question to the plaintiff, who was her nephew. Subsequently, she died, and in the probate of her estate this land was distributed to Catherine McGarrigle, the mother of this plaintiff, subject to a life estate in plaintiff. Thereafter Catherine McGarrigle conveyed her fee to plaintiff, who instituted this action. Defendant claims by the deed above referred to from Cordelia Jones to the plaintiff, and the construction of that instrument is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leaver v. GaussSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Reed v. HazletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Pinkham v. PinkhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Sperber v. BalsterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Bigley v. SouveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carman v. AthearnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. California Trust Co. v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Long v. HoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Hochsprung v. StevensonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Krutzfeld v. StevensonMontana Supreme Court · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API