Legal Opinion

Vanetta U.S.A. Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 29, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-8. Court No. 97-01-00117Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AQUILINO, Judge.

Although the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment herein served to condense their controversy, the court concluded in Vanetta U.S.A. Inc. v. U.S., slip op. 03-67, 27 CIT -, 2003 WL 21468613 (June 25, 2003), familiarity with which is presumed, that the opinions of their respective experts on the definitive issue(s) had to be subjected to cross-examination at a trial. That examination has taken place, and counsel for both sides have now filed briefs thereon commensurate with their excellent conduct thereof.

I

The motion papers showed the imported merchandise in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API