Legal Opinion

Phx. Mech. Pipeline, Inc. v. Space Exploration Techs. Corp.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 13, 2017No. B269186PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*777LUI, J.

*844Plaintiff and appellant Phoenix Mechanical Pipeline, Inc. (Phoenix Pipeline), appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained the demurrer of defendant and respondent Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) without leave to amend. The trial court found that Phoenix Pipeline could not pursue its claims for payment for construction and related services against SpaceX because Phoenix Pipeline failed to allege that it had a contractor's license. After several attempts to cure this defect, the trial court concluded that Phoenix Pipeline could not amend to comply with…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Panasonic Corporation of North America v. Powertree Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  2. West Pacific Electric Company Corporation v. Dragados/FlatironDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API