Legal Opinion

Lycoming Trust Co. v. Allen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1931No. Appeal 11PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Plaintiff Lycoming Trust Company claiming to be a holder in due course, brought suit against the maker of a $2,000 promissory note alleged to have been made by him to the order of Park Amusement Corporation, and bearing the following indorsements: “Park Amusement Corp., N. E. Watson, Treas.; James Y. Bennett Co., by Sherman E. Bennett; West End Lbr. & Supply Co., Inc., C. E. Updegraff, Pres. ’ ’ It alleged that it acquired the note from the last indorser before maturity for a valuable consideration. In his affidavit of defense defendant admitted the execution of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Collins v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Putnam v. Ensign Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Capitol Hill State Bank v. Rawlins National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hartzell v. Ebbvale Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. First National Bank v. Colonial Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prestressed Structures, Inc. v. Bargain City, U.S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Weiss v. Friedman's HotelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. VanSyckel v. Egg Harbor Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Fairman Bros. v. Ogden Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Security Tr. Co. of Pottstown v. HubertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API