Legal Opinion
United States v. Ortiz-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 2005No. 03-30355, 03-30371, 03-30356PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Per curiam
The government charged defendant-ap-pellee Jose Luis Ortiz-Hernandez with illegally re-entering the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The government also charged Ortiz-Hernandez with violating the terms of his supervised release from a prior federal drug conviction by this illegal reentry. The two proceedings were consolidated in the district court. The district court suppressed fingerprint evidence in both the criminal case and the supervised release proceeding. United States v. Ortiz-Hernandez, 276 F.Supp.2d 1113 (D.Or.2003). The district court then denied the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Crowe v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Hosvaldo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Geraldine Nicholson v. Miguel GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Hinkle v. Beckham County Board of CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.