Graybiel v. Auger
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. L. W. Fulkerth, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This action was instituted by plaintiff for the purpose of recovering damages from the defendant for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as a result of being struck by an automobile owned and driven by the defendant.
The trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The plaintiff was awarded judgment in the total sum of $1,050. This sum included expenses for medical attendance, plus loss of wages or compensation, and $500 on account of pain and suffering sustained by the plaintiff.
It appears that the plaintiff at the time of the injury complained of was driving a Dodge…
2Cited by10 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Giorgetti v. WollastonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bruening v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Havens v. LoebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.