Bruening v. Miller
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
This action is based on negligence. At the close of plaintiff’s case the court, on motion, dismissed the action against the defendants Frank Miller, Fritz Miller, and Richard W. 'Clark; also the counterclaim of said defendants against plaintiff. From these orders no appeal was taken and they are not involved in this appeal.
Thereafter the court, on motion of the other three defendants, directed a verdict in their favor upon all the issues. From a judgment on this verdict, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff has appealed. The only question presented is the correctness of this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seith v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Hartnett v. Boston StoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Curran v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Deitchler v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Kastler v. TuresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Albrecht v. Waterloo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Boepple v. MohaltMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Serles v. BraunSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- American Company of Arkansas v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.