Legal Opinion

State v. Moylett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 1993No. D890539M; CA A77510Published

1Opinion of the Court

860 P.2d 886 (1993)

123 Or. App. 600

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Lawrence William MOYLETT, Appellant.

D890539M; CA A77510.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 3, 1993.

Decided October 6, 1993.

William Uhle, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Thuemmel & Uhle, Portland.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

LEESON, Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. MoylettOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MendeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. DykastOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API