Legal Opinion

Sunderhaus v. Board of Adjustment

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1989No. 8828SC1139PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Defendants, the Town of Biltmore Forest and its Board of Adjustment, appeal from a judgment vacating the Board’s order that plaintiffs, Earl and Mardene Sunderhaus, remove a satellite-dish television antenna from the yard area of their home. We affirm.

Earl and Mardene Sunderhaus reside in the Town of Biltmore Forest (the Town). Their home is located in a Residence A District, a district zoned for single-family dwellings. Sometime prior to 18 October 1983, a trench was dug in the Sunderhauses’ yard, and PVC pipe was placed in the trench. This work was done as part of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Town of Hillsborough v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Application of Campsites Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Warner v. W & O, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Application of Rea Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MLC Automotive, LLC v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Simpson v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Browning-Ferris Industries of South Atlantic, Inc. v. Wake CountyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
  4. Russell v. Guilford CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Randolph County v. CoenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API