Cameron Surgical Specialty Co. v. Tynan
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtEstes, J.
This action is founded on an agreement alleged to be a promissory note. The defendant pleaded the Statute of Limitations.
*509The instrument declared on was as follows:
“$139.00 6-28-29
CAMERON’S SURGICAL SPECIALTY 00., 666 W.
Division St., Chicago, U. S. A.
Please ship as soon as convenient, subject to strikes, accidents, or other delays beyond your control, the following.........................................
1 complete # 79 Oto Diognostoset Minus.......... .. .Oralite... .plus tonsilassistant...................■
To James J. Tynan... .hereinafter called the vendee, at ■ Torrington, Conn. Said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Porter v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Sloan v. McCartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Central National Bank v. HubbelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. Daniel Russell Boiler Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Lincoln Park Garage v. Devonshire Financial Service Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931