Lincoln Park Garage v. Devonshire Financial Service Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This is an action of tort for the conversion of an automobile. At the trial in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston the judge refused to rule, as requested by the defendant, that “On all the evidence the plaintiff is *304not entitled to recover in this action,” and to make other rulings requested by the defendant, and found for the plaintiff.' On report to the Appellate Division the finding was vacated and judgment ordered for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed.
The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff sold an automobile to one…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Tripp v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Goodhue v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Lynn Morris Plan Co. v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Bacon v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walker v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Marder v. Moose Hill Spring Tonic Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Cameron Surgical Specialty Co. v. TynanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1937
- McCartney v. ClarkMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1946
- Nay v. BrickmanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1937