Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. Daniel Russell Boiler Works, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
These four actions of contract, which were tried together, are brought to recover the amount of certain “trade acceptances” identical in form except as to dates, the amount, the time of payment, and the drawee. The declaration in each case consisted of three counts upon a separate trade acceptance, and, the plaintiff having waived the first count in one of the actions, the trial proceeded upon the remaining eleven counts. The answers were a general denial with averments of payment, and that the indorsements were ultra vires as to the defendant corporation, as well as the want of authority of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nunez v. DautelSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Merchants' National Bank v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Costelo v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- National Bank of Newbury v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Cherry v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- New Hampshire National Bank v. Garage & Factory Equipment Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- City National Bank v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Bartoshesky v. Houston Trading Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- State Trading Corp. v. ToepfertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Atlantic Nat. Bank v. HanfligCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.