Legal Opinion

Louden v. Ball

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1884No. 9399PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The allegations of the first paragraph of the appellant’s complaint may be thus summarized: Ball is the sheriff of Fayette county, who received and executed the writs hereinafter referred to, and James N. Huston is the administrator of the estate of William Huston, deceased. John S. Reid was the owner of real estate on which he executed a mortgage to the decedent on the 22d day of July, 1872. On the 3d day of April, 1873, one William J. Hawkins recovered a judgment against Reid on an individual claim for $459.83, on which appellant became replevin bail, and which judgment he was compelled…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wilder v. KeelerNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Meech v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Bake v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Averill v. LoucksNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Mower v. KipNew York Court of Chancery · 1836

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fisher v. SyfersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Purple v. FarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Talbott v. EmmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Fuller v. Exchange BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API