Legal Opinion

Robinson v. McKnight

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1930No. Docket No. 7113PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

In this action for malicious prosecution, tried with a jury, plaintiff had judgment for $20,600. On motion for new trial the amount of the judgment was reduced to $10,000. From this amended judgment defendants appeal.

Appellants are husband and wife and respondent is the sister of appellant John F. McKnight. Appellant John F. McKnight swore to a criminal complaint charging respondent with assault with a deadly weapon upon the person of his wife, the other appellant. Upon this charge respondent was arrested, confined in jail for eleven days and, after a hearing before a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Carver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In Re Cheryl H.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Centers v. Dollar MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Kincaid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API