Robinson v. McKnight
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J., pro tem.
In this action for malicious prosecution, tried with a jury, plaintiff had judgment for $20,600. On motion for new trial the amount of the judgment was reduced to $10,000. From this amended judgment defendants appeal.
Appellants are husband and wife and respondent is the sister of appellant John F. McKnight. Appellant John F. McKnight swore to a criminal complaint charging respondent with assault with a deadly weapon upon the person of his wife, the other appellant. Upon this charge respondent was arrested, confined in jail for eleven days and, after a hearing before a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Carver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re Cheryl H.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Centers v. Dollar MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Kincaid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.