Legal Opinion

Watson v. Watson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1957No. 18,867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

The sole error assigned as grounds for reversal of the judgment herein is the action of the trial court in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new trial. Said motion alleges (1) “That the judgment of the court is contrary to law;” (2) “That the judgment of the court is contrary to the evidence;” and (3) “That the judgment of the court is contrary to the law and the evidence.” No other grounds for reversal are specified.

The rule is well established by numerous decisions of this and the Supreme Court, that assigning as a ground for a new trial that the “judgment” is contrary to law or is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SchneiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Adkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Harr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Holtzman v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson Farms v. CORNO FEED PRODUCTS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Shuman v. HaukIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Ramey v. UrbanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Thompson Farms v. CORNO FEED PRODUCTS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API