Legal Opinion
Hatfield v. King
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 24, 1902No. 221PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
184 U.S. 162 (1902)
HATFIELD
v.
KING.
No. 221.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted November 11, 1901.
Decided February 24, 1902.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA.
Mr. Holmes Conrad and Mr. Edward C. Lyon on behalf of interested parties, petitioners to dismiss the appeal.
Mr. Maynard F. Stiles opposing.
Mr. W.P. Hubbard, Mr. C.W. Campbell and Mr. John H. Holt filed a brief on behalf of intervenors.
Mr. Stuart Wood filed a brief on behalf of the State of West Virginia.
MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. v. Amador Medean Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Shelton v. TiffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Cleveland v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Booth v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- In Re State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tiger v. LozierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Adkins' Heirs v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Carlson v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.