South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. v. Amador Medean Gold Mining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF . THE UNITED- STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ■ The cáse is,stated in t'he opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
delivered the opinion of the court. •
This was an action brought by the Amador Medean Gold-Mining Company against the South Spring Hill Gold Mining Company in tlie Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, where it was tried on an agreed statement of facts, and a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, to review which this writ of error was prosecuted. ■’ The opinion .of Judge Sawyer, holding the Circuit ■Court, will be found reported in 36 Fed..Hep. 668.
When the case came bn for argument in this court the attorney for plaintiff in error very properly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Cleveland v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Wood-Paper Company v. HeftSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Washington Market Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
3Cited by95 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.