Legal Opinion
Estate of Henry Barabin v. Astenjohnson Inc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 16, 2012No. 10-36142, 11-35020PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Concurrence by Judge TASHIMA; Concurrence by Judge GRABER.
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
AstenJohnson, Inc. (AstenJohnson) and Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (Scapa), appeal the district court’s entry of judgment in favor of Henry and Geraldine Barabin following a jury trial resolving Henry Barabin’s claim that his mesothelioma was caused by occupational exposure to asbestos. AstenJohnson and Scapa manufactured dryer felts that contained asbestos and that were installed on paper machines used in the paper mill where Henry Barabin worked. As now relevant, AstenJohnson…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Patrick BaconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Jon Liebsack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Pooshs v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- ADVO, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Johnson v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.