Elliott v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. J. Hill, County Counsel, Roy V. Reppy, Assistant County Counsel, and Vincent Morgan, Deputy County Counsel, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment. The record on appeal consists of the judgment-roll alone.
The first count of the complaint alleged that certain storm waters, prior to the injury complained of, had always flowed in a westerly direction, in a course a mile north of plaintiff’s land, and not over, through, or across said land; that in February, 1914, the defendant wrongfully and unlawfully, and without plaintiff's consent, by certain concrete conduits and ditches constructed by it in 1913, in connection with a protection district known as the San Fernando Protection District, diverted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Sala v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- House v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Roe v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Smith v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Mayer v. Studer & Manion Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.