Legal Opinion
Day v. Maynard
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 13, 2000No. 99-7059PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On November 3, 1999, this court issued an order notifying Mr. Day that he had three strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We ordered Mr. Day either to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prepay the entire filing fee as required by § 1915(g), or to show that the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act do not apply to this proceeding. Having now considered the arguments raised in Mr. Day’s response to the court’s order to show cause, and also those raised in his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we conclude that § 1915(g) applies and that he is…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ricky Ashley v. E. Dilworth, Co-1, Maximum Security UnitCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Rivera v. AllinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Patton v. Jefferson Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Clovis Carl Green., Jr. v. Honorable Edward W. Nottingham, District Judge Honorable Richard M. Borchers, Magistrate JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- O'NEAL v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- McLean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Pointer v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- David Orr v. Tom ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Childs v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.