Legal Opinion
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Glow Electric Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 29, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This case comes into this court on error from the court of common pleas of Hamilton county, where a judgment was rendered against the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, defendant below, plaintiff in error here.
The issues are found in the second amended petition and in the answer, refiled to the second amended petition.
It is alleged on the part of the defendant in error, the Glow Electric Company, that it, through the shipper, delivered to the plaintiff in error, the railway company, at Clinton, Oklahoma, for delivery to the shipper at Cincinnati, upon notice to the defendant in error, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. C. C. Whitnack Produce Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Collins Produce Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ross v. Troy & Boston RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- D. H. Overmyer Co. v. Nelson-Brantley Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Modern Tool Corp. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
- Tuschman v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Snowden v. Tremont & G. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.