Legal Opinion
Beaumont Broadcasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 10, 1952No. 10888PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
Beaumont Broadcasting Company, appellant, and Ozarks Broadcasting Company, in-tervenor, enjoy simultaneous use of the 560 kilocycle band for standard broadcasting. Because of their geographical separation and limited broadcasting power, each station has long operated without causing electrical interference to the other. In 1945, however, a chain of events was set in motion which ended this state of affairs and ultimately resulted in the present litigation. To understand the issues before us, we must relate the administrative developments as they unfolded.
Tn November of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Reilly v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Democrat Printing Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilton E. Hall and Greenville, Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Spartan Radiocasting Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Interstate Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, E. Weaks McKinney IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Central Television, Inc. And Wtwv, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Beam Broadcasters, Ltd., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Harrell v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- National Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boise Valley Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor. Gem State Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Boise Valley Broadcasters, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.