Legal Opinion
Wilton E. Hall and Greenville, Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Spartan Radiocasting Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 22, 1956No. 13231_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
Appellants protested a Federal Communications Commission order of April 30, 1954, granting intervenor a modification of its permit to construct and operate a television station on Channel 7, assigned to Spartanburg, South Carolina. 1 ' Those protests were denied by the Commission without a hearing, upon the ground that appellants did not appear to be “parties in interest,” but we reversed that action and remanded the cause to-the Commission for hearing under § 309 (e) of the Communications Act. 2 Greenville Television Co. v. Federal Communi cations Comm., 1955, 95…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Woko, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Clarksburg Publishing Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Ohio Valley Broadcasting Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Logansport Broadcasting Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Coastal Bend Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Coastal Bend Television Company v. The United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Van Curler Broadcasting Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Telocator Network of America v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- WBEN, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Television Corporation of Michigan, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Wood Broadcasting, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- City National Bank v. James E. Smith, Comptroller of Currency of the United States, Meadowbrook National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- H & B Communications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Prescott Tv Booster Club, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.