Legal Opinion

Fidelity Financial Services v. Cox (In Re Cox)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 28, 2000No. 19-03701PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING TRIAL

JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Following trial held on Fidelity Financial Service’s (“Fidelity”) Complaint Objecting to the Discharge of Creditor’s Debt (the “Complaint”), the Court now makes and enters Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Pursuant thereto, a portion of the debt owed to Fidelity by the debtor Victor Cox will by separate judgment order be held nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) because that debt was incurred due to a willful and malicious injury by the debtor to Fidelity or its property.

FINDINGS OF FACT

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Miller v. J.D. Abrams Inc. (In Re Miller)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. In the Matter of Marvin C. THIRTYACRE, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. Dobek (In Re Dobek)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  2. Rae v. Scarpello (In Re Scarpello)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  3. Ocean Equity Group, Inc. v. Wooten (In Re Wooten)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  4. Johnson v. Davis (In Re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
  5. Zamora v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API