Legal Opinion

Fluke v. Canton, Adjutant General

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1912No. 583PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Original proceeding on the complaint of T. C. Fluke and others against Frank M. Canton, adjutant general, for contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

On January 5, 1912, the complainants represented to this court by proper petition: That in December, 1908, upon a petition filed by a sufficient number of the citizens of Delaware county, an election was called having for its object the removal of the temporary county seat from Grove, Okla., to a place called Jay; that as a result of said election, upon the face of the returns thereof, the place of Jay was declared to be the county seat of Delaware county.

That afterwards, in due time, a proceeding was instituted in this court for the purpose of contesting said election and preventing the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  3. Mitchell v. HarmonySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. In re MoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Jayne v. DrorbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Constantin v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Hand v. Superior Court for Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Holt v. District Court for the Twentieth Judicial District, Ardmore, Carter CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API