Legal Opinion

Shenefield v. Axtell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C. J.

Plaintiffs seek to recover damages upon the theory of slander of title. The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that they are in possession of certain described property; that defendant is the sole stockholder of Cascadia Development, Inc.; that on June 23, 1967, plaintiff Alida Shenefield was the sole owner of the property and that by mesne com-veyances the property was deeded to Cascadia Development, Inc. as trustee only, for the benefit of plaintiff only. The complaint then goes on to allege as follows:

"II
"Alth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Shell Oil Co., Inc. v. HowthTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Kidd v. HoggettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Woodard v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Cawrse v. Signal Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Summa Corp. v. GreenspunNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Erlandson v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Honeyman v. ClostermannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Romero v. US Life Ins. Co. of DallasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Benskin, Inc. v. West BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API