Legal Opinion

Brown v. Dahl

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 14, 1985No. 6762-5-IIPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.

Lindell L. Brown and his wife, Edith, appeal from a jury verdict for the defendants in a medical malpractice case and the trial court's dismissal of their informed consent claim for relief. The issues on appeal are whether (1) the court erred by dismissing plaintiffs' informed consent claim for relief; (2) the court improperly instructed as to the standard of care for health care providers; (3) the court's instructions as a whole overemphasized defendants' theory of the case; and (4) the court erred by refusing to instruct on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. We reverse and remand.

On the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. ZeBarth v. Swedish Hospital Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Miller v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood BankWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Backlund v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pacheco v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API