Legal Opinion
Karson v. Arnow
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbraham N. Geller, J.
In this action for injunctive relief the court granted defendants’ motion made at the opening of trial to try the counterclaim first. Analysis of the causes of action and prayer for relief in the complaint indicated that a determination sustaining the counterclaim for specific performance of a certain memorandum of understanding between the parties might be dispositive of the entire case (see Civ. Prac. Act, § 443, subd. 3).
Nobilium Processing and Products Co., Inc. (hereinafter Nobilium) was organized in 1947 by defendant Arnow. It operated a dental laboratory in this city and also sold…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- New York Telephone Co. v. Jamestown Telephone Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- 1240 Third Ave., Inc. v. BirnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Brassteel Manufacturing Co. v. Mitsubishi International Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- T. C. V'soske, S. T. V'soske, K. A. V'soske, George A. Spater and V'soske Shops, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick and E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Vista Co. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- International Telemeter Corporation v. Teleprompter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Dynamics Corp. of America v. International Harvester Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Reprosystem, BV v. SCM Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.