Legal Opinion

1240 Third Ave., Inc. v. Birns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

The main question upon this appeal is whether the contract annexed to the complaint is binding upon the parties and enforcible as matter of law. This action is at law for damages because of defendants’ failure to perform.

Plaintiff claims that defendants agreed to purchase premises owned by plaintiff at the corner of Seventy-third street and Third avenue, Manhattan, under a lengthy written contract prepared upon one of the standard title company forms, setting forth in great detail all the essentials of a real estate purchase contract.

The principal issue litigated at trial was whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. People v. . St. Nicholas BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Scholtz v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  4. People v. Saint Nicholas BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Karson v. ArnowNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bondy v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Belasco Theatre Corp. v. Jelin Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  5. Judis v. V. B. Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API