Legal Opinion

Brassteel Manufacturing Co. v. Mitsubishi International Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

Defendant moves for an order pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the first cause of action for the breach of a written contract for legal insufficiency.

In pleading this cause plaintiff sets forth the relations of the parties, that they entered into a contract in writing, plaintiff’s readiness to perform and its commencement of performance, and that it duly demanded performance of the defendant which wholly failed and still fails and neglects to perform.

The allegations of due performance are adequate as to all contract terms, inclusive of the requirement that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Locke v. PembrokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Becker v. Peter A. Frasse & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Hart v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Kendall v. Oakland Golf ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Babdo Sales, Inc. v. Miller-Wohl Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Karson v. ArnowNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Babdo Sales, Inc. v. Miller-Wohl Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API