Legal Opinion

State v. Wilt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1985No. Cr. 1080, 1091PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

Theodore Wilt and Duaine C. Altman were convicted of issuing checks without sufficient funds in violation of North Dakota Century Code § 6-08-16.

Both Wilt and Altman challenge the validity of their convictions on the very grounds recently rejected by this Court in State v. Clark, 367 N.W.2d 168 (N.D.1985). These challenges therefore are without merit and warrant no further discussion.

Altman further contends that NDCC § 6-08-16 is being unconstitutionally enforced.

In State v. Carpenter, 301 N.W.2d 106 (N.D.1980), and State v. Fischer, 349 N.W.2d 16 (N.D.1984), NDCC § 6-08-16.2…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Crawford v. Board of Ed. of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. Gamble Skogmo, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Olson v. Bismarck Parks & Recreation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bulman v. Hulstrand Const. Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ZenoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. City of Minot v. JohnstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API